Nick Fuentes Responds To Dan Bilzerian Calling Him A Fed | Blasphemer Reacts

0:00 Intro
22:00 Intro Over
32:00 Dan Bilzerian

Like and Subscribe, new videos coming out soon

https://x.com/Blasphemer1054

https://kick.com/blasphemersabyss

Transcript

0:00 · All right, welcome back everybody. Let's get straight into it.

0:03 · Good evening everybody. You are watching America First. My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. We got a great show for you tonight. Very excited to be back here with you on Thursday. We have a lot to talk about tonight. Lots to get into. Big show. We actually don't have a ton of news. Lot of drama. Always the drama. Always something. But kind of another slow news day.

0:32 · That's fine. Our featured story tonight, we're going to be talking all about the war in Iran, which might be about to start back up again.

0:40 · Oh, definitely starting back up. I got to say, the Twitter beef stuff, the Twitter drama is getting absolutely ridiculous. It's just that is some peak slop.

0:49 · And we're finally going to have to talk about it. I've been procrastinating the entire week cuz I'm really just past it. I don't know if you could tell. We did about 60 days of Iran war coverage and honestly I'm just over it because we've been talking about this war realistically for like three years.

1:12 · It all goes back to October 7th which was I think two and a half a little bit more than two and a half years ago. But tonight our featured story we're going to talk about the ceasefire which may have just collapsed might finally be over.

1:26 · And the way that I like to think about it is you have the official status of the war which we have been keeping track of very closely. There are the facts on the ground. There is the diplomacy, public diplomacy that is being uh conducted via truth social and press release and press pools and Trump statements. And the way that I like to think about it is that right now we are in the period of the indefinite ceasefire. There's so much misinformation, straight out lies that are being put out by the authorities.

2:01 · You would think that in wartime there would at least be some caution of how much misdirection, how many lies are we putting out there and everything they're putting out is just a lie. So, we just got out of the various deadlines for this major attack on Iran's civilian infrastructure that started, I believe, the week before Easter and took place basically throughout the entire month of April.

2:27 · And ever since, I believe it's two weeks ago from Tuesday, two days ago, we have been in the period of the indefinite ceasefire. And what you could call this is that we are clearly slowly backing away from the conflict. We've been in a ceasefire now for I believe a little bit over four weeks and there is no timetable, no deadline, no ultimatum for military action to begin again. At least there's not a hard deadline. And so it seems that the Trump administration is trying to stall and buy time to soften the blow as we effectively withdraw from the conflict unilaterally without any kind of strategic or tactical victory or even any kind of change in the tempo or dynamic in the conflict.

3:18 · Just it's just a bunch of strategic losses. It's like loss after loss. You have the closure of the straight giving basically giving the straight to Iran. You have all sorts of different things going on that are just strategic L's.

3:31 · And so the big development today is that it seems there is new tension in the Persian Gulf which is going to upset this process. Like I said, we are two weeks into the indefinite ceasefire. That is an extension off of the original twoe ceasefire. And what happened today is that after the United States enforced its blockade against an Iranian tanker yesterday, so the US Navy fired on an Iranian commercial vessel yesterday.

4:03 · Today, Iranian speedboats tried to attack a US destroyer in the Persian Gulf. The US destroyers had to retreat from the straight of Hormuz. And after their retreat, there was a major attack on some of the Iranian islands and on the Iranian coastline, for example, at Bandar O, which is one of their port cities. So, it was sort of a tit fortat exchange. As you know, Iran has closed the strait with their blockade. Naval warfare can just be trickier than other types of warfare.

4:38 · It's like, yes, you the US can dominate the air. a land invasion. Of course, if you bring overwhelming firepower, you could probably dominate there. Still could take a lot of losses, but just the water itself is so tricky. There's so many uh coes and you know, it's just radar being such a big factor out there like what you can even spot on radar. If you don't if it's not big enough to see on radar, you know, it's basically invisible. You have these small boats going out. You have mines. It's a very tricky battlefield. We have closed the straight on the other side in the Indian Ocean with a blockade of our own. Iran has closed the straight with the threat of using drones and missile strikes against shipping and we have blockaded the straight by threatening attacks on Iranian commercial shipping with our own navy. So an Iranian commercial vessel tried to go through the straight. We enforced the blockade by attacking it.

5:34 · Iran retaliated against our destroyers and then we counterattacked by bombing their mainland and their islands. So if you're following it's a tit for tat and then back again. Trump administration says this is not the end of the ceasefire even though that is what Iran is saying. Iran is calling this a violation of the ceasefire agreement.

5:56 · Sounds like they don't have want the smoke. It sounds like the White House doesn't have the appetite to continue the war. Iran totally does. Iran's like, "We're willing to like keep this going if you guys are. You know, we just spent all this time restocking. I hope you did." Is basically what Iran's been saying.

6:11 · And it's not clear whether that means we're going to resume hostilities. But Washington says that this was a love tap, which is kind of funny. That's how Trump characterized it today. He said that the strike on Iran's mainlands and islands were simply a love tap and that the ceasefire is still in place. Now, here's the big picture. The same day that all of this went down, Tyrron and Washington reviewed a two-page proposal to end the conflict.

6:41 · And the proposal says that the United States will end its blockade. Iran will open the straight to commercial shipping, hostilities will end, and there will be a 30-day period where the US and Iran will try to work out a comprehensive agreement. Have we heard this before? I mean, this is kind of the stuff we've been talking about from the very beginning.

7:03 · And the sticking point in all of this, as it has been throughout this entire process over the past 2 and 1/2 months and going back to Rising Lion and Midnight Hammer last year and even before that, the sticking point in this entire thing is the centrifuges, whether Iran will commit to zero enrichment or an enrichment moratorum.

7:26 · And so Iran wants to discuss that issue another day and in the meantime open up the straight. And it seems that the United States is insistent that this be resolved at some point during this peace process either now or during this 30-day period where there's going to be a ceasefire. Because if the United States doesn't achieve that, then we will have achieved nothing. And if we achieve nothing in this conflict, then Iran reestablishes deterrence. There is a much higher cost of entry to re-engage Iran in a war. And almost certainly we're kicking the can down the road where we're going to have to confront them all over again over exactly this issue. So specific the weapon that Iran employed, it's pretty simple actually to make uh US boats turn around it. They are anti-hship missiles where they basically got the plans, the schematics from China and now they're building them domestically in Iran. They're very simple missiles to make. So Iran has this native capability to keep the US Navy very far from its shore. You know, I don't see how you get around this. So there's clearly a push. There's an impulse in the United States. We want to get out of this. We want to walk away from it. We're slowly backing out, slowly backing away. At the same time, we just can't quit because this nuclear issue is unresolved and the Iranians are absolutely defiant.

9:00 · So, we'll talk about all that. We're going to get into it. We're also going to talk about the tariff ruling if we have time. Man, it just gets better and better. So, you might remember that last year the Trump administration imposed tariffs on every country in the world. Almost a year ago to the day, Liberation Day, believe it was April 2nd, 2025.

9:20 · Trump announced basically a global minimum average tariff of about 10 15% on every country in the whole world. And he did this under this emergency provision that as of February has been overruled by the Supreme Court. You might remember that in February the Supreme Court overturned all of these emergency tariffs, the ones from Liberation Day, the ones that were being used effectively for diplomacy against Canada, Europe, China, other countries.

9:50 · It seems like a a lack of proper procedure. You know, there are ways to go about this to make sure that people can't undo the actions that you're taking, the policies that you're enacting. when you do it halfaphazardly and quickly and you're cutting corners because you'd want to do it fast and you're told I'm just executive order it do it with an act of con that way you know then they have to use Congress to repeal it it's like it's this is simple stuff man they can just challenge it in court you know if you do it executive order style and it's easy and so all the tariffs were rescended and the Trump administration has to give a refund fund in the amount of almost $170 billion.

10:35 · Well, after that ruling was made in February, Trump administration invokes a new law, section 122, to impose a minimum 10% tariff on almost every country that had tariffs under that emergency provision. So Trump basically said, "If the Supreme Court is invalidating the old tariffs, we've got another law. We've got another legal provision lined up to reimpose the same tariffs in the same amount against the same countries."

11:07 · Well, spoiler alert, those tariffs under section 122 have just been overruled by a federal court. And so a panel of federal judges have reviewed the section 122 10% minimum tariff and they have found that Trump improperly applied that law. And we're not going to get into the specifics. It's really not that important. But now those tariffs are being overturned as well and refunded.

11:39 · So the Yeah, look, I'm pro tariff, you know, and this is just a silly way of going about it, you know. This is just a lazy way of going about it. There's no other way to put it. You know, you wanted to do it the short way. Well, you found out the hard way. The original tariffs are gone and refunded. And now the replacement tariffs are also gone and also refunded. So, as of right now, we effectively have no tariffs.

12:07 · Year and a half into the Trump administration, we're going to lose the midterms and there's still no tariffs. And what I want to point out about this, if we don't have time to get to it tonight, is that this characterizes everything the administration has done, they're not building a border wall. They're putting the military on the border.

12:30 · They're not going to pass a new tariff schedule through Congress. They're going to and misuse emergency powers for tariffs that we're going to have to refund anyway.

12:42 · We're not going to change the law and make it so that the federal debt ceiling can't be lifted any further or cutting a certain amount of spending for every new dollar that's spent. No, we're going to do Doge and we're going to bring in all these people and try to find waste fraud and abuse in the last 3 months and none of them are even hired through the proper channels. and Doge, they were actually what they were doing is were straight up installing Palunteer software on pretty much all the government computers they could get their hands on. Like that was the real objective. That's what they're actually getting subpoenaed by the Democrats over. Like if you look it up, you realize like, oh my god, these guys are basically, you know, they're working on behalf of Palunteer and they're getting all these government systems on the software, you know, and getting all of your data and getting it sent back to their headquarters in Tel Aviv. Straight up.

13:36 · What do all of these things have in common?

13:39 · What they all have in common is that instead of Trump using his political capital to actually make lasting change, governing effectively, going through the legislature, building infrastructure that cannot be torn down, instead of building a legacy that is actually lasting, using Congress, using your political capital to actually achieve meaningful reforms that are going to last for decades or for a century, instead you have all ad hoc garbage where they're prioritizing speed, they're prioritizing flexibility, they're lazy. Arguably, it's just incompetence and they're doing a lot of things, but at the end of four years, none of it is going to last. There's at the end of all of this, if a Democrat wins in 28, they're going to take the military away from the border and the border is going to be open again. Without a tariff schedule, a Democrat's going to come in.

14:37 · They're going to lift all the tariffs.

14:39 · No more tariffs. Without any kind of without putting it into the law that you're cutting the debt or the deficit, you're going to get another president, Republican or Democrat, and they're going to spend $1.5 trillion on the military like Trump wants to. They're going to run up. You're going to have another 78 trillion federal expenditure for the year. And the debt is going to keep going up and up. I think we're at 130% debt to GDP. it's just going to keep going higher.

15:07 · It's the same story with every issue. And this is why I say, and we're going to get into this once again a little bit tonight. This is why I say the only thing that is really going to help anything is we absolutely have to have a powerful executive come to power in this country.

15:29 · It could have been Trump. Trump could have done it. He blew it again. I know it's crushing. I know it's sad. I know a lot of people don't like to admit this.

15:38 · You know, he's the kind of guy who's so narcissistic, he can talk exactly what the people want to hear to for him to get elected. That's the simple truth is that, you know, when you're born a hustster, you're eternally a hu.

15:53 · But Trump really had an opportunity in 17. He really got another opportunity in 25. He could have been that guy. And arguably there's very little that would have stopped him. There's very little that would have stood in the way.

16:07 · Look at how quickly and decisively he was able to move in those first few months in 2025. The left was disorganized. We had a unified government. We had both chambers of Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court. We really could have done it, but it we just had the wrong guy. We had the wrong guy. We had the wrong people with the wrong plan and the wrong agenda. And now we blew it. and none of this is going to come to fruition. We're they're running out the clock. We're running out of time. And in 28 it's going to be over. And so this is why I say it's really as simple as we need somebody in 28. And I'm not joking. It's not hyperbole. It's not an exaggeration. It can be done. We really just need a Caesarike figure, a tyrannical figure that is going to as a master of governance that is just going to make some structural systemic changes to how the government works. We need to build a border wall. We need an immigration more.

17:09 · It's not like a crazy thing. It's like America used to be extremely conservative in the 1940s and 50s. Now, I'm not one of these people that wants to go back in time, but I think we can look at this and go enforced hierarchy, you know, a authoritarian government that might be good for a little bit, guys. Like, let's be real. How else are we supposed to get back to a sane civil society unless you're not unless you're willing to put aside your libertarian ideals and fantasies? torium. We need some kind of spending moratorum. We need to rework entitlements.

17:48 · You need to have a tariff schedule. Do you know what a tariff schedule is? It means we're going to take a look at every import and export coming into and out of the United States and we're going to have technocrats, experts assign a tax based on that sector, based on that individual good. We're going to bring in the industry experts. The United States used to do this. The last tariff schedule, I believe, was passed in the late 1920s, I think around the time of the Smooth Holly tariff. We can do these things. It can be done. We can have we can have a powerful executive with technocratic experts and we could put the country back on the right footing.

18:30 · But we need a radical departure from the past. We need a radical break. And I think that's the only thing that can do it. Otherwise, it's going to be a very slow and painful slide into calamity, into an absolute catastrophe. So, anyway, like I said, if we have time, we'll get into the tariffs. I don't know that we will, though. But if we do, we'll talk about it.

18:51 · Before we get into the news, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble. Smash the like button. Leave a comment. Let me know you think about the show. Remember to check out our merch store at fentis.store. get our spring and summer collection. Lot of nice stuff. We have the white America first hat. We got the shorts. People are loving the shorts.

19:15 · And we we have a bunch of other stuff. I don't really feel like showing it, but check it out. fentus.store. And if you want to support the show even more than you already are, remember to go to america plus. 15 bucks a month to become a plus subscriber. You get access to every episode of the show, every debate, every commentary stream, every gaming stream, every collaboration. It's all there.

19:41 · And we have an RSS feed, MP3 format, MP3 download.

19:46 · Listen, if you're trying to find those Nick and Chad Champion Fortnite collab streams, which are the goated streams, that's where you got to go.

19:55 · So, I know some people like to download the show. they like to watch it on their commute to work or listen to it. It's a good option. 100 bucks a month to get to get access to the Telegram group chat with me, the $100 a month club. And I'm in there. I was in there all day yesterday, all day today, hanging out, talking with you guys about everything and anything, dropping voice messages, bonus content, giving you really the inside baseball. And honestly, today is one of those days when you really get the value and really this whole week because there's been a lot of drama.

20:30 · There's been a lot going on. And so, like, this week is the week you want to be in the $100 a month club cuz I don't really talk that much about the drama on the timeline.

20:41 · If you go on the timeline, I'm all about the business. I'm talking about our mission, which is to get the Democrats elected to Congress. Everyone on Twitter is just so obsessed with inter interpersonal beef. It's just ridiculous. You know, you know, you get into politics cuz you actually want to discuss the issues. Meanwhile, the whole social media sphere, the whole scene is just everyone attacking each other, you know, making fun of each other. It's like, okay, can we actually get to the meat and potatoes of like why we're into politics? It just seems like a lot of people want to waste time clout farming, you know, with beef and drama. And it's like, yeah, I get it. Like a a lot of politics like is entertainment to a lot of people, but it's like to me it's boring. It's not stimulating. I don't really care for drama. I'm talking about the mish. I'm responding to edits of myself on Telegram. I'm posting funny stuff, but if you really want the inside baseball, if you want the drama, you want the dirt, you you want to talk shop, I'm in there, that's where to go.

21:48 · America First Plus.

21:51 · Okay, so with that out of the way, we're going to get into it. And look, once again, we're we're going to get back into this before we even get into Iran and everything else. We're going to procrastinate a little bit more. So, I don't really know what is going on. I I'm a little confused. Do I have a karmic debt? Like, what is going on? Like, seriously, dude.

22:19 · The people are just coming after Nick.

22:21 · Like, it's just random ass like content creators, people on Twitter, YouTube, or whatever. It's just like random hit pieces coming out of nowhere. It's the season, right? It's got to be cuz it's springtime.

22:32 · Alanteer, make the call.

22:35 · What is happening here? Because it is like for the past two weeks, I have been under this coordinated attack. Think about it.

22:45 · All of a sudden, Jonathan Greenblad goes on TV and says he's going to get every Groper clipping account banned from Instagram. The Atlantic does a huge hit piece about how all my clips need to be banned on Instagram. The Canadian broadcasting company, State Media, shuts down Entropy, which is how I make the super chats. They literally fly out to Asia and they do a big hit piece on my super chat platform. Yeah, the CBC is incredibly cancer. So, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, for Americans or anyone who doesn't know, the CBC is like literally state media. Vast majority of their money comes from literally the state. It's to the tune of about $3 billion a year in Canadian taxpayer money. So whatever that is, you know, it's probably uh, you know, a couple hundred American dollars.

23:37 · So the CBC is incredibly left, like extreme left. They're not even like regular liberals. They are all activists and they soak up all of this money and to operate in in like the media sphere in Canada is basically suffocating. They take up all of it and they're just horrible on basically anything you could think of. The CBC are just the worst.

24:03 · They active they have like a whole department of people that just go out of reporters to go out and just find normal people content creators and make smear just smear campaigns about them. If you go on CBC's YouTube page, they're making smear videos about like average Canadians that, you know, just disagree with the CBC and the government's politics. Washington Post does a giant like 5,000word hit piece on the super chats invoking Christine from Ohio, talking trash about the show, all this other stuff.

24:40 · Then they do this skinuit conference this past weekend where they bring in all the ops and all the turd worldish mud slimes, left-wing filth, haters, eg girls, whatever.

24:56 · And then I don't know, today it's just like the bottom fell out. Everybody's attacking me today. And so I see all this stuff and I'm like, wow, they really don't want white people to vote Democrat. Is that what it is? Think about it. I really didn't even think that was the biggest taboo.

25:14 · Oh yeah. I mean, you think about, you know, you can say all you want about different races, religions, nations. You can say all that kind of stuff, but as soon as you try to get people off the voting plantation, you try to get them out of the voting matrix, you know, that's when you actually get the real attacks.

25:33 · There's some red lines you just can't cross. I guess lately you can attack Jews all day long. That's totally in fashion. You can attack is you can be racist. People don't even bat an eye when I say the n-word. Nobody even cares. But you start to say, "I'm off the Republican plantation. I'm voting Democrat." And everybody loses their minds. Why? Because all that other stuff is according to their plan.

26:02 · Nick Fuentes is anti-Semitic. says the N-word, the Goyam are waking up. You know, that's all part of the plan.

26:10 · Nobody freaks out because all of that is predictable. All of that is a part of the plan. You know, it's always the people that were redpilled by Nick like a year or two ago and then they go like listening to Nick for like a year or two and then they go, "Well, actually the Nick isn't the movement. Actually, the movement is bigger than Nick and actually I'm the movement. I know better. There's so many people like that.

26:35 · But you know, for the past four years, we've all been saying, "Hey, Republicans are not doing anything they promised to do. They're not deporting the illegals. They're not keeping us out of the war. They're giving is tens of billions of dollars."

26:51 · And the Republicans say, "Well, what are you going to do about it?" Huh? What can you do? You've got no options. You've got nowhere to go. We're the only game in town. What are you going to do? Vote Democrat?

27:04 · And what happens? What happens when the groers What happens when the Wang halves What happens when the white guys say Yeah. Yeah. I'm thinking we are I'm thinking we are going to vote Democrat. We are going to vote Democrat in the midterms. We are going to vote for Amy Actton in Ohio. Yeah. Because [ __ ] this Indian.

27:27 · Yes, we are voting for Amy Actton because this Indian anchor baby. He's a literal anchor baby. You ran on mass deportations. You ran on ending birthright citizenship.

27:42 · And you're Yeah. And it's not like we don't hate Indians over here. like you know that's one thing we always have to be super clear cuz we are on the far right whatever nationalists but like don't just have like an irrational hate of Indian people but it's the fact that his parents had him in the country you know illegally he is a pharma bro he's a tech bro he's in bed with all of these connected people with JD Vance with Peter Teal Palunteer this is why we don't like Vec and VC has anti-he He espouses anti-white ideology and that's just you can't have any of that stuff.

28:20 · You're running an anchorbaby firstgen Indian pharmaceutical billionaire who hates Americans for governor and you're surprised when people say, "Yeah, this guy needs to lose. I'm going to help him lose. I'm going to vote for the Democrat. I'd rather have the lesser of two evils." Yeah, a Democrat is less bad than an anchor baby Republican. So, it seems like this is how I know it's the right move.

28:54 · You understand?

28:56 · When you encounter the resistance, that is when you know you're doing the right thing. People say you're getting all this push back. It's so it's so provocative. It's so controversial. People are saying it's unthinkable. You're ruining everything. How could you do this? It's unthinkable. That's how you know we're exactly where we need to be. You are exactly where you need to be.

29:21 · Because honestly, this is the same kind of dynamic when I said not to vote for Trump. Remember that? I mean, I got to say, no pay, no gain, right? like if you don't feel like you're, you know, getting, you know, a a little bit of push back, you're not getting anyone rubbing up against your ideas and being like, "Oh, I don't like that." You know, are you really progressing? Are you really coming up with anything fresh, anything new? Like, if you're coming up with something new and and fresh, if you're coming up with a new idea, pe there are going to be people that are rubbed the wrong way about it. It's inevitable, but it kind of means that you're on the right track in a way. All these people that are telling me not to vote Democrat, they were all proTrump in 2024 down to a down to a man and woman.

30:09 · They were all saying, "You can't sit this one out. What are we really going to have, Kamla? This is the most important election of our lifetimes. It's going to be a golden age. How could you remember? I remember.

30:23 · I remember the exuberance of election night. people posting the jib jab face swap of VC RFK Jr. Tulsy Gabbert Tucker and Trump and Vance dancing to Staying Alive by the Beeges and people said that was funny. People said that was a good meme. People said that we have all the energy. Woke is dead.

30:46 · It's all the same people. They were behind then. They were two steps behind then. And then they caught up and said, "Oh my gosh, you were so right. How were we so blind? We kneel. Trump was a Jewish puppet." THEY'RE TWO STEPS BEHIND NOW. And now it takes them three weeks to say, "Why is he saying to vote Democrat?" I don't get it. This is too complicated.

31:10 · It seems like real politic to people is just goes over a lot of people's heads. Maybe it's just like, you know, what is it that people commonly say like half of the population are like NPCs? It's like the meme or whatever. Only 50% of people have an internal monologue.

31:26 · If you can't understand this, I feel like and there's just a lot of partisanship. I feel like most people are smart enough to really get this. I think the vast majority of people are not that dumb, but I do feel like there's enough partisans out there that just make this rough.

31:42 · So I saw for example Dan Bilzerian today says he says on Twitter first he's telling us that the left is trying to right-wingers now he says to vote for the Democrat in Ohio it's too contradictory and it's like Dan I know you're not that smart but it's really not that complicated. I mean, it really boils down to that.

32:12 · This is why they call us Goyam. Like, sorry. This is why they call us Goyam. I used to think low IQ anti-semitism is just something that they said.

32:22 · I was wrong. Okay. I was wrong. Low IQ anti-semitism is real. You know, I've never been a big fan of Dan Bzerian. Now he talks the talk on is but and Jews and all of that but to ignore his past like the guy you know totally lied about his experience in the Navy as a Navy Seal. He never was a full-on Navy Seal.

32:48 · So he just lies and then he portrays this lifestyle, you know, that is ultimately fake, too. And then people look to him as well, you're the red, you're such a red pillar, man. like you are red pilling everybody. It's like sorry but I didn't get red pill by down Bill Xarion. Okay, maybe somebody did watching some podcast but I'm sorry but I don't consider him an authority when it comes to this subject whatsoever.

33:17 · It's Dan Bilzerian.

33:19 · You know it, I know it. Pretty much the whole world knows it. There is such a thing as low IQ anti-semitism. We have been seeing it. It has been out of control. It has been running rampant. And what do I mean by that? It's these people that all they know how to say is it's the [ __ ] juice. That's all. It's like they're just pressing a button. They can't tell you anything about it. There's no depth.

33:47 · There's no complexity. There's no even real understanding. They don't know anything about anything.

33:54 · That's all they maybe Hitler is a good guy. a Holocaust joke. It's a [ __ ] Jews. Hey [ __ ] it's a [ __ ] Jew. I know. I know, Dan. He calls me up on the phone. He tells me it's the Jews for two hours. I want to say, Dan, I know. Hi, nice to meet you. I'm Nick Fuentes. I've been saying that for 10 years. I know.

34:20 · Every time he calls and I pick up the phone, he's telling me about how the communist commisaurs are Jewish. Got it. I know. He's telling me about how it's all of them. Uh I know he's telling me about how, you know, Israel is causing all the wars and not I know.

34:40 · Preaching to the choir. Got it. Anyway, so he says he's telling us that the left is going to kill us, but now you're Look, I mean, how much clearer can I make it? I've said it. I've said it so many times. I've said it so many times.

34:59 · Yeah. I mean, trying to explain this for like I'm the millionth time, you know, like just go look, read the Wikipedia page for real politic, guys. Like read, I don't know, the biographies of great men, right? I think that's the best place to understand what we're talking about here. Look at the great men of history, all right, that we talk about all the time, right?

35:21 · Look at their lives. You know, that's the kind of stuff that we're talking about. We are going Democrat in 2026. This is a midterm election year. Do you understand that? It means that every House seat is up for election and onethird of the Senate is up for election. The president is not up for election this year, Dan.

35:42 · Okay. Now, if Democrats win the House, then for the next two years, you'll have a Republican president, a Democrat House, and maybe a tie in the Senate. Maybe Republicans will maintain control.

35:55 · And the Supreme Court is favored for the conservatives. So, what does that mean?

36:00 · It's almost like the system has checks and balances in place, but if you didn't know that or understand that and you just press the same button every time, it's like yeah, not understanding the mechanisms of the government, you know, comes out in these kind of, you know, conversations, these arguments like very quickly. It means that Democrats are not going to be able to do whatever they want. There's no scenario where that happens because of checks and balances.

36:28 · The Democrats in the House will have to reconcile anything they pass with the Republican controlled Senate. And even if the Democrats control the Senate, the president will have to sign off on any legislation. And that can only be overcome by a supermajority in the Senate of three-fifths.

36:47 · Okay? This is civics 101. And the Democrats will not have that. So what does this effectively do for the next two years?

36:58 · It does not give Democrats total control. It just checks the power of Trump. Right now, the Republicans control the White House, the House, and the Senate. And what that means is that in key votes, like for example, on the Epstein files, Republicans are able to block that legislation. The only reason that the Epstein files came out is because a handful of Republicans, one of whom who is now retired, Marjorie Taylor Green, mutinied against the GOP and voted with Democrats. But if Republicans had a bigger majority, they would have been able to bury the Epstein files permanently. think about like the War Powers Resolution Act, like trying to restrain the president when it comes to, you know, just waging war within that 60-day period of when he's just allowed to wage war with no restrictions. If you have more Democrats, then they're going to be able to stop that. They're going to be able or sorry, actually vote for that. I mean, but they're going to be able to stop the war by voting for stuff like a war powers resolution. It's like very simple kind of stuff. The same is true at the War Powers Act.

38:11 · There was a resolution in the Senate to shut down Trump's war in Iran. It was a partyline vote. Every Republican, with the exception with the exception of Ran Paul, voted to prevent the Senate from blocking Trump's war in Iran. If the Democrats controlled the Senate, maybe they would have stopped the war. Okay, so this is just basic stuff. What's more, the Democrats control the House under the Constitution. They gain oversight powers. What does that mean?

38:43 · It means they can subpoena, compel the release of documents. They can depose, compel testimony. They can create subcommittees. And what they will do almost certainly is they will investigate the Trump government. Don't we want that? If Trump is in the Epstein files, don't we want the Democrats to impeach him?

39:02 · Yeah.

39:02 · It's like just because it's Trump, there's a lot of Trump supporters that are willing to basically completely apologize for anything to do with Epstein wash it all away. Oh, it's actually just the Democrats is a Democrat hoax. It's ridiculous. It's like the same people that are obsessed with Epstein now act as if they don't care, right? Especially you see all this all this new stuff that's coming out very recently like uh just yesterday.

39:27 · Don't we want the Democrats to open up an investigation? Don't we want them to compel the release of documents, compel testimony? They get that with oversight powers and they will do that. And people say, "Oh, well voting doesn't matter. Oh well, it's all a uni party." Well, the Republicans and Democrats are still vying for power between each other. And so, yes, just like the Democrats gained the House in 2019 and immediately impeached Trump and created subcommittees and subpoenaed and all those other things, they're going to almost certainly do it again in 2027.

40:05 · And that is a good thing. They will slow down this government. And here's the big picture. Okay, here's the big picture. Let me just say it again for everybody at home. Here is the big picture. Okay, in 2028, let me just tell you the significance of this. In 2028, this will be the first election since 2012 when Donald Trump is not on the ballot.

40:29 · That's a really big deal. Trump was on the ballot in 2016, 2020, 2024, and it really wasn't even negotiable in the last two elections. In 2016, there was a real primary contest, and the people chose Trump. But in 2020, he was running as an incumbent, so there was no primary. And in 2024, he might as well have been running as an incumbent because he was seeking a non-consecutive second term.

40:55 · I mean, he's just been a total like vacuum. Just completely sucks all the oxygen out of the room. Any of the Republicans have just been like shut down when it comes to primary Donald Trump. Just the level of personality cult around him. And but that also just doesn't translate to Vance. You're trying to graft essentially, you know, you have essentially uh you're trying to create, you know, JD Vance the grafted, you know, you're trying to put, you know, the mega legacy onto basically onto JD Vance's body and you're going to have this cursed abomination of a grafted JD Vance with this what this dead mega corpse attached to him.

41:36 · Essentially, that's what it I know it's a grotesque image, the dead corpse of Magga being grafted to JD Vance's body, but that's essentially what that is, right? Okay. So, 2028 is going to be the first time in 16 years. It will have been 16 years since Trump is not on the ballot. And obviously, so much has changed in 16 years, much of it having to do with Trump. So going ahead to the 2028 primary, I believe that the rightwing in this country, the white people, the Christians, the conservatives, the nationalists, the immigration hawks, the anti-war people, the social conservatives, I believe that anybody that would identify as right-wing or Republican or as part of the opposition, we deserve an opportunity to have a fair fight. And by that I mean we should get options. This is the first time that Trump is not going to be shoved down our throat. So 2028 we should have an open primary where we actually have a competition. It should be competitive and we should have a lot of different voices and get a say in where the Republican party is going to go after Trump and where the country is going to go. This is vital. You're going to get a what? A debate stage of JD Vance, Vetc Rama Swami, what Tucker Carlson maybe because on the Democrat side, you know what you're going to get on the Democrat side, like I will be the first one to say the Democrats are [ __ ] okay? And they do want to kill us and they do want to destroy us.

43:17 · They're going to put up somebody like they don't even want to entertain the notion that they'll nominate a white man. Okay, we're getting BLM on steroids. We're getting the trans agenda. We're getting democratic socialists. We're getting people like Hassan [ __ ] and Zoran Mandani. We're getting feminists. We're get We're getting absolute garbage. We know we're going to get garbage from the Democrats. We know what we're getting.

43:42 · Nobody wants that to happen. Okay? I want them to win in 26 for those reasons. I do not want them to win in 28. I do not want a Democrat to be in charge of law enforcement at the federal level, which is what happens in a presidential election year. I do not want a Democrat to have a unified government, meaning to have the White House and both chambers of Congress.

44:03 · That would be ruinous. And yes, they would kill us if they did that. So, we know what we're going to get with the left. It's going to be garbage. We know that's not something that we can entertain.

44:13 · People ask me sometimes what I disagree with Nick on. I don't think the Democrats are necessarily going to kill all right-wing people in 2028. Um, I don't think that's logistically feasible. I don't think they're going to do that. I don't think that's politically viable. You might have Antifa in the streets and stuff like that, but you know, you have Second Amendment, right? So, the only opportunity that we have is if we get a good Republican nominee. We need a good because that's the only place where you're going to get nationalism. You're not going to get a nationalist, an immigration hawk. You're not going to get somebody that is going to restrain Jewish power in the Democratic party.

44:49 · It's only going to come from the Republican side, but from a specific faction, and that faction can only exercise influence during the caucus and primary process, during the Iowa caucus, during the New Hampshire primary. That's where if you have 15 candidates, you only need a candidate getting a plurality of the votes to get the delegates.

45:14 · So, you know, if you have a big crowded field and the vote is split between 10 or 15 people or something like that, that is where the gropers or the nationalists or somebody that is truly savvy. They won't even need to win a majority of everybody. They're just going to need to rack up enough delegates with a plurality. That is our opportunity to get somebody sympathetic in the White House, which is where it counts. Okay. Now, let's think ahead to 2028. What is happening right now is that there is a shadow war between JD Vance and Marco Rubio.

45:51 · They both want to be coronated. Neither of them wants a primary process. They don't want to compete. They don't want to have to fight off against a dozen other candidates. And the party is looking the party and by that I mean the endorsements, the rank and file, the conference in Congress, the donors, they're making their decisions about which of these candidates, the VP or the Secretary of State are going to be coronated as a successor. And once that decision is made, the whole party is going to line up and consolidate behind one of them. And if you have one super powerful candidate like let's say JD Vance is the guy and Rubio falls in line then he is going to crush everybody in Iowa. He's going to crush everybody in every primary and he's going to be the guy. Or vice versa. If everybody consolidates behind Rubio, then Rubio's the guy and Vance falls in line and he's just going to crush everybody. Yeah, Rubio his shells are just so incredibly cringe cuz they every time something happens they just upload like an AI edited photo of Marco Rubio dressed as something else. So they'll be like, "Oh, he's like the emperor of Cuba. Oh, he's the, you know, Shaw of Iran or whatever." Just, you know, absolutely glazing this guy and it's like, "Dude, this guy is a total shill for total Zionist. No, I do not think Marco Rubio is based whatsoever. No, he's not.

47:19 · And both of them are unacceptable. JD Vance has his connections with Palunteer. Rubio has his connections in Florida with Miriam Adlesen and with the rest of them, Paul Singer. Both of these options are totally unacceptable. So, think about 2028. You have on the Democrat side Gavin Newsome, terrible. AOC, terrible. JB Pritsker terrible.

47:44 · Each worse than the last. And on the Republican side, if we do nothing, it's going to be Vance terrible or Rubio terrible. All bad options. I'm thinking ahead to 2028. I want Vance and Rubio to be as diminished as possible. And that only happens if the Trump administration is sabotaged. The Trump administration has to fail in every way. Has to become more unpopular, weaker.

48:15 · the it has to become so toxic that Rubio and Vance are hurt by their association to it so that it increases the odds that an outsider that is not a part of this train wreck, this occupied administration can come in from the outside as a breath of fresh air for a reset and define a whole new period with Trump off the ballot in the next primary. This this is what we're thinking. This is yeah the only way to get what we want essentially right is to show that these two guys are in fact losers right we have to show that they don't win elections that JD Vance and Marco Rubio bec Ramma Swami these guys don't win elections all right because they are so hated all right that you're going to get the far right to vote Democrats just because you guys are So terrible. All right. Like we have to keep all of that in mind.

49:15 · What we're cooking up and what's funny.

49:17 · So I've explained this like a hundred times. I've explained it so much, but people just can't wrap their heads around it. They're like, "Wait, wait. So you're a Democrat?" It's like, "No." Like, and then they go, "Wait, wait. So you want to vote for them now, but you're saying they're going to hurt us in 28?" It's like, "Yeah, okay. Yes. Yes. I want them to win this election, not the next election.

49:45 · Anyway, so that's the idea. But I'm getting a little bit blackpilled because people are just I mean, here's the thing. It's going to h regardless. It's going to happen this way. Okay, screenshot this. Screen record this. I want everybody to record how they feel right now because in 2028, I'm going to be absolutely vindicated.

50:09 · Oh, it's going to be so sweet when everybody is, bro. Everybody is going to be singing this tune. All right. When in 2028, let's be real, you guys do not want to vote for JD Vance or Marco Ruby. Like, I read the comments. Some people think I don't read the comments. I see the JD Vance fans in the comments section, the anti- panickins or whatever.

50:31 · You guys are going to be on our side in 2028. Mark my words. You're going to look at these guys as what they are. You'll come around, you'll see that Rubio and Vance are just total losers.

50:42 · You are once again watching the magic in action. And this time, I'm going to talk my [ __ ] and I'm going to say it confidently with my chest. You might watch those clips from three years ago and say, "How did he predict the war in Iran? How did he predict that Trump would be this bad? How did he predict that there'd be no mass deportation? How did he predict it down to the month, down to the letter?" Those same people are now saying, "I don't get it. Whoa, we're Democrats now. Screenshot this.

51:10 · It's happening all over again. I will be vindicated. Democrats are going to win the House.

51:16 · The next two years of the Trump administration are going to be a train wreck. He might die in office. I don't want that to happen, but it might happen. He's certainly going to be impeached. That would really be actually a horrible outcome. Not only because I never I never wish on anybody and you know there part of my life where I did actually like Trump. uh you know and there'll always be a part of me that likes his personality you know not as new not the new Trump that we have not this current one but you know the old one I think we all appreciate that in a way so I think it's you know disappointing a lot to see just the transformation of character of Donald Trump really they're going to grind every initiative every program to a halt it's he's only going to get more unpopular and soon okay in 2027 The Republican primary is going to begin.

52:09 · The Republican primary for the 2028 presidential election is going to start sometime next year. Like it might happen in January. It might happen in the spring or summer, but it's going to happen at the minimum at the earliest at the midpoint next year. And these are the conversations that people are going to have. The donors are already making their decisions. They want to start donating to Rubio or Vance. All of this is starting right now. We have to start thinking about this right now. And if you want an opportunity, if you even want a chance in hell at having a Groper president, a nationalist America first president, we have to start gaming it out right now.

52:54 · And you know, this relates to what just happened with Casey Bush. Okay, Casey Push who ran against VC Ramaswami in Ohio. So it would have been ideal and probably winnable if a America first candidate ran against VC for the Republican primary in the governor's race. Casey Push ran a terrible campaign, raised no money, didn't listen to his adviserss, and he still got 18% of the vote. And people are right that that's a big deal.

53:27 · And you know, people are asking, well, what was the crash out you were referring to? Because I was talking about the other day Casey Bush crashing out on Twitter. He was coming after Nick and all of the groers for not supporting him enough when he was right before that, a few days before the election, he was saying that he had no like basically no chances of winning. He was basically admitting defeat before the votes were even cast. And you know, it's just that's just not what we're about. That's not the energy. No one's looking to get behind that. And yeah, he started attacking, you know, mainly Nick, but a lot of other people for not supporting.

54:04 · And that was, you know, the context.

54:06 · It's huge. He got over a 100,000 votes. And it's true. He raised no money, had no operation, did no events, no verality at all, nothing. But you know what he says after he loses this winnable election? He says, "Well, I only raised $100,000 and I've only been in it for five months, so that's pretty good." And people say, "Why aren't you supporting this guy?" Here's the difference.

54:33 · I don't want to be a day late and a dollar short and [ __ ] lose and then shrug my shoulders and say, "Hey, not bad for not bad." No, we need to win. We need to win. So there's all the difference in the world between somebody who gets redpilled yesterday, sees a race, goes all in with no intention of winning, five months, five months before the primary, doesn't even know if they're going to be on the ballot and says, "Hey, let's just give it a shot.

55:03 · Look, we're not taking this seriously. Nobody really plans on winning. Maybe it'll go well. Who cares?" No, that's not good enough. The 2028 primary is winnable, but listen, it's a presidential primary. If we're going to have a chance, you got to take it seriously. And taking it seriously means you need to think that far ahead. And it is a bit convoluted.

55:31 · Okay? Yes, I know this requires some second and third order thinking, but that is what is required if you want to be a Mchavelian. That is what is required if you want to win in politics.

55:45 · So, no, I'm I don't want to wake up in the middle of 2027 with my dick in my hand and my pants are on my ankles and say, "Oh, gee, I think we need to get in the primary. Somebody needs to do something. Uh, let's start a campaign and not know if we're on the ballot."

55:59 · No, it seems like there's a prevalence of this attitude that you can just wing things, right? You can just improvise, right? And it's like, well, maybe I'm a little bit stuffy. Maybe I cuz I come from the world of like classical music or whatever, but I think you should play things properly, right? I think you should have a plan. I think you should execute it uh as close to 100% as possible. I think that requires like skill and discipline. And I don't think this idea of we're just going to wing a campaign. I don't think that really works. I want to see skill. I want to see planning behind this. I want to see resources. I don't want to see your flim flammy campaign that looks broke. Like, let's be real. I don't want to see their lack of action on social media, which is just a skill problem. Like, let's be real. Yeah. I don't want to see this kind of stuff. That's not the candidate that I'm excited in. Let's be real. We need to think about this now. And we need to think about the challenges that we are going to face. And I'm telling it to you right now. I'm not a fortune teller. I'm not an oracle. I'm not a soothsayer.

57:04 · But next year, our top op is going to be JD Vance and Marco Rubio because they have the boss. Trump is the formerly the head of the party as the president. They are second and third in the chain of command in the government. I I think Secretary of State is fourth. I'm not sure, but it's like Vance and Rubio.

57:24 · No, I I'm pretty sure it is third, isn't it? Or is it is it the majority leader in Congress? I'm I got to look that up.

57:30 · formally in government and informally in the party. They are the successors and they are going to suck up all the money, all the earned media, all the attention and all the votes if there is not a wrecking ball that hurts them. I can't destroy them. The gropers are not strong enough to destroy the GOP machine. But the Democrats are. If the Democrats are empowered in 26 because they are naturally set against Republicans, they are powerful enough to degrade meaningfully their chances of winning.

58:04 · How? Democrats having oversight power will subpoena and depose members of the Trump government. They will expose the fraud, real fraud, real corruption, real Epstein stuff, the rest of it. It is going to be so radioactive and poisonous and toxic. It is going to seriously wound everybody in this administration.

58:26 · And that is good because those are the people we're going to be fighting against in the 2028 primary which starts next year. Yeah. So Marco Rubio would actually be according to the uh AI answer. I think he's a fourth in line because you would have JD Vance, Mike Johnson as the speaker of the house, Chuck Grassley as the president prompor of the Senate and then the line continues with the secretary starting with what order the department was created in. So secretary of state coming first. So that would make him fourth in line. So you know that's all I have to say to all these people is call me when you want to get serious. Okay? Th this this cutesy stuff where you go on Twitter and say, "Oh, maybe Hillary was the good guy." It's fine. You know, it's fun. It's fine. Hit of dopamine. It's a viral post. It's great. Whatever. Call me when you want to get serious because when you get serious, you start looking at power. You start thinking about how power works.

59:30 · You know, these mechanisms of government, maybe to nerds like myself or Nick, are just inherently interesting. I like to understand like how these, you know, bureaucracies and how these, you know, these legislative acts and and stuff like that, how does this actually like function, right? Cuz this rules your lives essentially, right? These are where the rules are forged. And so, you know, anyone should really go and just take a good study of how the rules actually work because, you know, that's where our minds really need to be. What are the rules of the Congress and the Senate? Like that kind of stuff.

1:00:05 · And that's how we have to think about these problems. That's how we have to think about these challenges. Take it from me. I'm not just a 10-year veteran of, you know, talking about Jews. I don't just go on the show and say Jew for 10 years. I've also been a student of the Trump movement.

1:00:25 · I've known people in the administration in the first term, in the second term. I know the donors. I know high level officials. I know how this went the first time. I know how and where it went wrong.

1:00:39 · I know what happened the second time around. I know how and where it went wrong. I lived it. I lived through it. I lived through the first four years of Trump and the campaign and all the fights happening in the bureaucracy. I lived through the four years of Biden and the prosecution or persecution of the dissident and playing that whole game and being in the opposition, Republicans running in 22 and and [ __ ] us over even then Marjorie Green's deal with Kevin McCarthy, we were there for that too.

1:01:11 · And then throughout this whole process, this election, this term, the personnel, you know, so it's a dual track like yes, we have been ascending in our understanding and consciousness of the Jewish problem or Jewish power, whatever. We've also been ascending in our consciousness and understanding of politics and how all of that works in Washington.

1:01:35 · And I'm telling you, I'm telling you, Vance is our biggest op. Vance Rubio, if you're looking for the biggest enemy of right-wing nationalism, it is the conservative center right, which is going to squaltch us. They're going to [ __ ] suffocate us. And no one is taking this seriously. You know, what's the more fed thing to say? you know, uh, maybe switch up your vote or no, you have to stay voting my party. It's like, I'm sorry, but if you're like insistent that, you know, going off the Republican plantation makes you a fed, I'm sorry, Dan Bilzerian, but you're just not smart enough to comprehend what's going on here. There is so much money being poured into that, laying the groundwork, think tanks and nonprofits, and a cadre of influencers, and they're getting the comedians in Austin, Texas on board.

1:02:29 · They're getting all this stuff ready. They and they have been planting these seeds for years. They have been planting these seeds for the past 10 years. And they are setting up. I am telling you, Tucker and Vance and Natan and Yormone and Barry Weiss and all of this, they're all doing it to suffocate and siphon energy from the dissident right from the nationalists, pouring it all back into a Vance 28 campaign.

1:03:00 · a Rubio 28 campaign and you can expect just as much America first from that as you got in this administration which is none which is nothing and nobody has taken that seriously and Num nuts numbum nuts and all these other people they just cannot even begin to understand anything that I just said because they do not care and they don't know the first thing about politics So, you know, enthusiasm is no substitute for cleverness. And that's really what they think. There are no participation trophies in this war.

1:03:39 · Okay.

1:03:40 · Casey Push and every other loser, this long list of has been and never was failed candidates and influencers and whoever. There are no participation trophies. You do not get a blue ribbon for enthusiasm. There is no at least I tried. At least I did something. Hey, I don't know if it's going to work. I don't care if it's going to work. It didn't work. At least I did something.

1:04:08 · That's not good enough. That's not enough. It has to work. And for it to work, it has to make sense. And it might be convoluted and it might be ambitious and it might be a little bit too complicated for your small head to understand. But that's how it has to be if we want to win. Time to get [ __ ] serious. I'm gonna run against Randy Fine. Dude, it's everybody that lives in your district is an old boomer evangelical. It like it just doesn't even make any sense.

1:04:40 · So, no, there there are now two tracks diverged. And honestly, it's a good thing. Honestly, it's a good thing. Let that be a magnet for every dummy. Let that be a magnet for every dummy. every numbuts, every low IQ person, everybody that just wants to do something. They don't have like a alternative here. It's like when Dan Bilzerian is like, "Oh, well, just vote Republican." It's like, "You're not coming up with an alternative. There's nothing new there going on, Dan. You're just telling everyone to stay on the plantation.

1:05:14 · Like, come up with a new idea, and maybe we can critique it." Then let that be a magnet for all of the refu lumping. and let this be a magnet for the elite human capital for people that want to think deeply about these problems. You don't even have to agree with me necessarily, but we do need to be on the same page that we're going to need a big picture.

1:05:35 · We're going to need a big idea. We're going to need a better mental model of the world than whatever is going on on that side. Okay?

1:05:43 · So, it's fine. So, honestly, it's fine. And that's the big idea. That's been the big idea. I've been saying it for a long time. I said it in 2024. I said, "We got to go against Trump." Nobody wanted to go there. They They were too late. And now here I am saying the same thing. I'm like, "We got to up the ante. We got to go Democrat. We got to break the mold.

1:06:04 · Break that taboo. We got to do it just once." And once again, people are saying, "Oh, it's too far. Oh, it's too complicated. Oh, I don't get it."

1:06:14 · Yeah.

1:06:14 · It's crazy. Like right before I started recording, I looked on Twitter and Dan Bilzerian is he's in current crash out mode right now at like 3:00 a.m. 4:5 in the morning. He's going insane right now on Twitter. So, but here's the thing.

1:06:34 · I let the predictions do the talking. I I'm not going to argue anymore. I'm not going to make the case anymore. I've made the case. And here's the good thing about this show. I always have my record. So, you do your thing and I'll do mine. You do your whatever that is.

1:06:49 · I'll do my thing. Let's just go our separate ways and let's just see what happens. Let's just see where we are in a couple of years. That's all I'm going to say. Let's just see what happens in 2028. And if you're confident, then you got nothing to worry about. That's the difference. I always put my money where my mouth is. I always go all in and I am always vindicated. Always. every single time. So, I'm done. May, you know, no more pearls before swine. I'm trying to explain this to somebody that doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Let's just see what happens.

1:07:24 · Let's just see where we are in a couple of years. People say, "You think this mythical dark horse is going to run and blah blah. Let's just see what happens."

1:07:32 · Okay.

1:07:33 · Yeah.

1:07:33 · I'm not listening to Dan Biller and the IG influencer who like fakes his whole lifestyle and is just what known for stolen valor. I'm sorry. You're not credible. Let's just see what happens. You and what army? You know, you and what army of only fans thoughts? That's the difference. I'm still the, you know, people can say they're the movement.

1:07:53 · People can say whatever they want. This is still the only movement. Always has been, is, always will be. This is the America First movement. Everybody knows that. You have no army. You have nothing. You have no ideas. You have nothing. You are nothing. So anyway, so we'll see what happens, but we're going to move on. We're going to get into the news. All right, guys. Next video. Like, comment, subscribe, comment down below.

1:08:17 · You know, I read them. I do read them. Actually, people are saying I don't. All right, guys. See you in the next video.